ソラナ（Solana）の‌価格

$BTC Solana’s planned upgrade to make payments final in a fraction of a second has reached its public developer network, giving application teams a place to test before it reaches the blockchain carrying real money. Called Alpenglow, the upgrade targets roughly 150 milliseconds for finality, the point at which a transaction can no longer be reversed, compared with about 12.8 seconds under the existing system. That could shorten the wait for an exchange to release deposited funds or a payment app to tell a merchant a sale is complete. Anza, the company building Solana’s core software, announced the developer-network switch on Sept. 25, a day after the separate testnet completed its transition. The Solana Foundation’s upgrade page lists Alpenglow as active on both networks. Developers use the developer network, or devnet, to check applications with tokens that have no real value. The separate testnet is used primarily to stress-test network software and validator operations. Read More: Solana starts testing upgrade that could cut finality from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds Alpenglow changes how validators, the computers that check transactions, agree on the network’s records. They will exchange votes directly instead of recording those votes as transactions inside blocks, the batches of transactions added to the blockchain. Agreement can then take one or two voting rounds. Removing those votes will also make some Solana activity charts fall. Transaction totals that include validator votes will shrink even if users make just as many payments and trades. The Foundation has told data providers to adjust their comparisons. Services that build transaction histories also need to keep competing candidate blocks separate until the network selects one. Mixing their contents could produce an incorrect record. Applications that simply send transactions and read account balances require no migration, according to the Foundation’s guide. The speed figure remains a target derived from simulations, rather than a demonstrated result under live-market conditions. Wallet processing and exchanges’ own deposit checks can add further waiting time. No firm launch date has been announced for the live network. Anza’s software schedule tentatively allows feature activations to resume Sept. 28, but does not identify that date as Alpenglow’s launch.

$BTC Senior trader Peter Brandt stated that he maintains his long-standing skepticism towards $XRP, adding that developments within the Ripple ecosystem and collaborations with banks have not changed his view. Brandt argued that a fundamental distinction should be made between Bitcoin and $XRP. The experienced trader characterized Bitcoin primarily as a “store of value,” while viewing $XRP as a crypto asset focused on transactions and usage. Brandt stated that while Bitcoin is a speculative tool today, it also possesses store-of-value properties, but he used a rather harsh expression regarding $XRP. The experienced trader, distinguishing Bitcoin from use-oriented assets like $XRP, directly referred to $XRP as a “dumb coin.” During the interview, the interviewer reminded Brandt of Ripple’s collaborations with banks worldwide and the company’s recent progress, asking if his views on $XRP had changed. Brandt, however, maintained his skepticism towards $XRP. Brandt first drew attention to $XRP’s supply, arguing that there were question marks regarding the total supply and whether it would expand in the future. However, he acknowledged that $XRP could be used cheaply and effectively in transactions. However, according to Brandt, the fact that $XRP is a useful trading instrument doesn’t automatically mean the token should become more valuable. Brandt cited the US dollar as an example, saying that while the dollar can also be used very effectively in transactions, people don’t expect it to appreciate in value simply because of that. The experienced trader stated that this is also his main argument regarding $XRP, saying, “Just because something can be used in transactions doesn’t automatically mean it has to be more valuable.” According to Brandt, the real question mark for $XRP is at what point its use for transactions will translate into real economic value for the token. Brandt also argued that cryptocurrencies should be categorized according to their use cases. He stated that transaction-focused assets like $XRP and store-of-value assets like Bitcoin should not be evaluated using the same valuation logic, and placed networks like Ethereum, on which applications can be built, in a separate category. However, Brandt spoke more positively about Ethereum and Solana compared to $XRP. Describing Ethereum as a “good asset,” the trader said he believes both Ethereum and Solana have the potential to reach higher levels. He also stated that he prefers Bitcoin to hold the majority of his cryptocurrency portfolio.

$ETH $SOL SOLUSDT 1D: Wave 1 or Wave A? Relative Strength at the Decision SOLUSDT 1D: Wave 1 or Wave A? Relative Strength at the Decision Point Sometimes the hardest part of an Elliott Wave count is not labeling what has already happened. It is deciding what the first recovery from a major low actually represents. That is the central question on this SOLUSDT daily chart: is the developing five-wave recovery wave 1 of a new impulse, or wave A within a correction that is not yet complete? Under the higher-degree count shown, SOL appears to have completed a five-wave advance that formed wave 3. The decline that followed was both deep and time-consuming, and can be interpreted as an A-B-C zigzag within wave 4. The recovery from the latest low is now developing as a possible five-wave sequence. This is constructive, but it is not confirmation by itself. A five-wave advance can begin a new trend, but it can also form wave A of a larger corrective recovery. The relative-strength clue The lower RSC pane, referenced against TOTAL, is being used here as a relative-strength filter. Its recent improvement suggests that SOL is beginning to perform better relative to the broader crypto market. This should not be interpreted as proof of new capital inflows or as a standalone buy signal. Relative strength becomes more meaningful during a pullback: if price retraces while the indicator preserves most of its improvement, the case for genuine market leadership becomes stronger. Primary scenario — white path In the primary count, the current recovery completes wave 1 of a new impulse. A controlled wave-2 pullback toward the marked decision zone would then be a normal part of the structure.

🟣 SOL/USDT — Technical Analysis Current Price: ~$120.9 Solana is currently trading around $121, with buyers attempting to maintain the recent bullish momentum. The most important short-term level is $123, because a clean breakout could confirm another upward move. Key Resistance Levels: $123 $128 $135 $140 Key Support Levels: $118 $115 $110 $105 Technical Outlook: SOL is currently holding above the $118 support zone. If buyers push the price above $123 with strong volume, the next potential targets are $128 and $135. On the other hand, rejection from $123 followed by a breakdown below $118 could trigger a short-term correction toward $115 or even $110. Prediction: My short-term outlook remains bullish above $118. A confirmed breakout above $123 could create enough momentum for SOL to test the $128–$135 region. Trade Idea: 🟢 Long above $123 🎯 TP1: $128 🎯 TP2: $132 🎯 TP3: $135 🛑 SL: Below $118.50 This is technical analysis, not financial advice. Trade with proper risk management. $SOL