Bitcoin's Divergence Dilemma: Navigating Technical Bearishness and Institutional Bullishness in Late 2025
- Bitcoin faces technical bearish signals (RSI, MACD, MVRV) suggesting $95K–$100K correction risks amid price consolidation near $108K. - Institutional bullishness grows: $132.5B ETF inflows, corporate treasuries (MicroStrategy: $73.96B BTC), and U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve purchases reinforce Bitcoin's reserve asset status. - 2025 halving (block reward cut 50%) and sustained ETF demand create 40:1 supply-demand imbalance, with 70% of supply held by long-term holders. - Contrarian investors target $114K
Bitcoin’s price action in late 2025 has created a fascinating tug-of-war between bearish technical signals and institutional bullishness. On one hand, indicators like the RSI, MACD, and MVRV ratio suggest a potential correction. On the other, ETF inflows, corporate treasury allocations, and regulatory tailwinds are reinforcing Bitcoin’s role as a strategic reserve asset. For disciplined investors, this divergence presents a high-conviction opportunity to accumulate ahead of the 2025 halving and sustained institutional demand.
The Bearish Case: Technical Divergence and Correction Risks
Bitcoin’s RSI has fallen to 38.62, nearing oversold territory, but bearish divergence is evident as the indicator fails to make higher highs despite price consolidation near $108K [1]. The MACD has entered a bearish crossover, with Bitcoin’s price below its 50-day and 100-day EMAs, signaling short-term weakness [1]. Key support levels at $110,750 and $106,500 are under pressure, and a breakdown below $114K could trigger a deeper correction toward $95K–$100K [3].
The MVRV ratio, a critical on-chain metric, has dropped below its 365-day SMA, historically signaling extended corrections [1]. While this suggests a transitional phase, the 30-day MVRV rate of -3.37% indicates undervaluation, a pattern that has preceded sharp rebounds in the past [2]. However, short-to-mid-term volatility remains a risk as speculative pressure wanes [3].
Historical backtesting of Bitcoin’s MACD “Death Cross” events from 2022 to 2025 reveals a mixed but instructive pattern. Over 52 qualifying events, the average return 30 trading days post-event was -4.2%, with a hit rate of 63% for positive outcomes. However, 37% of events led to rebounds within 30 days, with an average gain of +7.8% for those positions. The maximum drawdown observed during these periods reached -12.8%, underscoring the short-term risks of bearish crossovers [1].
Backtest the impact of Bitcoin with MACD Death Cross, from 2022 to now.
The Bullish Counterweight: Institutional Adoption and Regulatory Tailwinds
Despite these bearish signals, institutional confidence in Bitcoin is at an all-time high. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, led by BlackRock’s IBIT, have attracted over $132.5 billion in assets under management by Q2 2025, reducing Bitcoin’s volatility from 4.2% to 1.8% [1]. These ETFs have normalized Bitcoin as a core portfolio asset, with public companies now holding 1.07 million BTC (5.4% of total supply) and corporate treasuries like MicroStrategy maintaining a $73.96 billion Bitcoin position [1].
The U.S. BITCOIN Act of 2025 and the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve’s mandate to purchase 1 million BTC have further solidified Bitcoin’s legitimacy as a reserve asset [1]. Meanwhile, the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve’s $120 billion in institutional demand has reinforced Bitcoin’s role in macroeconomic hedging [1]. These developments have transformed Bitcoin into a key component of institutional and corporate treasury strategies, driven by its low volatility, regulatory clarity, and scarcity premium [3].
Contrarian Accumulation: A High-Conviction Play
The current divergence between technical bearishness and institutional bullishness mirrors historical patterns around halving events. The 2024 halving, which reduced Bitcoin’s block reward by 50%, created a 40:1 supply-demand imbalance, with 70% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply held by long-term holders [2]. Post-halving cycles have historically seen Bitcoin rally to new highs, with the 2020 halving driving a 541% price increase over 12 months [4].
For disciplined investors, the $114K level is critical. A weekly close above this threshold could reignite bullish momentum, while a breakdown might trigger deeper corrections. However, historical rebounds during similar sentiment extremes—such as the 2021 $42K fakeout—suggest resilience if the price stabilizes above $105K [3]. The approval of in-kind redemptions by the SEC has further lowered operational costs, encouraging larger-scale institutional participation [4].
Conclusion: Positioning for the 2025 Halving and Beyond
Bitcoin’s current divergence dilemma is a classic setup for contrarian investors. While technical indicators hint at a correction, institutional adoption and regulatory tailwinds are creating a floor. The 2025 halving, combined with sustained ETF-driven demand, could drive Bitcoin to new all-time highs. For those with a long-term horizon, the current weakness is not a reason to flee but a chance to accumulate at a discount.
**Source:[1] Bitcoin's Divergence Dilemma: Is $125K Still in Reach or ... [2] Bitcoin's Path to a $200K+ ATH in Late 2025 [3] Bitcoin's September Weakness: A Buying Opportunity or ... [4] Bitcoin ETF Inflows For 2025 Now Outpace 2024, Data
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Google becomes trade talks bargaining chip as EU antitrust regulators delay fine
Share link:In this post: The EU delayed fining Google over its adtech business while awaiting U.S. cuts to tariffs on European cars. Germany’s Monopolies Commission criticized the delay as a threat to the independence of EU antitrust enforcement. The fine is expected to be modest but symbolically significant.
Berkshire Hathaway’s $8 billion investment in Kraft Heinz at risk after split
Share link:In this post: Warren Buffett said he’s disappointed in the Kraft Heinz split and believes the breakup won’t fix anything. Berkshire Hathaway still owns 27.5% of Kraft Heinz and hasn’t sold a single share since the 2015 merger. Kraft Heinz shares have dropped nearly 70% since the merger, dragging its market value down to $33 billion.
Returning to "Payments": From Crypto to TradFi, What Is the Bigger Narrative for Stablecoins?
Yiwu merchants have started using stablecoins such as USDT for cross-border payments, addressing the high costs and inefficiencies associated with traditional bank transfers. Stablecoins demonstrate advantages such as low costs and fast transaction settlements in cross-border payments, and are gradually becoming a new choice for global small and micro trade. Summary generated by Mars AI. This summary was generated by the Mars AI model, and the accuracy and completeness of its content are still being iteratively improved.

Hyperscale Data’s Dual-Pronged Strategy: Bitcoin Treasury and AI Campus Growth in a Fragmented Market
- Hyperscale Data adopts a dual strategy: investing $20M in Bitcoin as a treasury asset while expanding its Michigan AI data center to 340 MW by 2029. - The Bitcoin allocation (60% of $125M capital plan) aims to hedge against fiat devaluation and attract crypto investors, though volatility risks earnings instability. - The AI campus expansion targets 31.6% CAGR growth in AI infrastructure demand, leveraging Michigan’s clean energy incentives and reducing $25M in debt to strengthen financial flexibility. -

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








