XRP and the "Exit Liquidity" Trap: Why Are Long-Term Holders Doomed to Be the Scapegoats?
XRP: Seven Years of Holding = Zero Return
If you invested $10,000 in XRP in September 2018, after experiencing several bull and bear cycles, SEC lawsuits, and countless bullish hype, by today in 2025, your assets would still be worth about $10,000.
This is the harsh reality for XRP holders:
In 2018, it reached an all-time high of $3.8, then plummeted
In the 2021 bull market, it rebounded to $1.9, but still failed to return to its peak
From 2018 to 2025, the price mostly moved sideways or even declined
For long-term investors, this is almost a lost decade.
The Truth About "Exit Liquidity"
The so-called Exit Liquidity means that retail investors in the market are not "wealth accumulators," but rather provide an exit for insiders to offload their holdings:
Insiders sell → price drops
Retail investors buy in → long-term losses
The cycle repeats itself
XRP is the most typical example.
Insider Manipulation: The Real Driver of Price
Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen still holds billions of XRP, enough to move the market single-handedly.
In July 2025, he transferred about 50 million XRP (about $175 million)
Of which $140 million flowed directly into exchanges
As expected, the price of XRP dropped immediately
Meanwhile, on August 10, 2025, a group of whales sold about 470 million XRP, further impacting market liquidity. And once again, retail investors were the ones buying in.
Not Just XRP: More "Exit Tokens"
This model is not unique to XRP; other projects have similar issues:
Cardano (ADA): Long claimed to be "academically driven," but ecosystem progress is slow, lacks core applications, and is more about speculation
PulseChain: Launched by HEX founder Richard Heart, raised about $700 million through a "sacrifice" model, criticized as an insider arbitrage tool
Hedera (HBAR): Controlled by a council of 39 enterprises, it appears to be an "enterprise chain," but lacks decentralization and is more like a corporate alliance
Common Patterns in the Model
These projects often share several common features:
Insiders hold concentrated control
Continuous token unlocks → constant selling pressure
Lack of real demand and application adoption
Weak narratives, overvalued
As on-chain analyst ZachXBT said:
"XRP, ADA, PulseChain, and HBAR are all MLM (multi-level marketing) chains, just providing exit liquidity for insiders."
Conclusion
The crypto market is harsh but real: tokens without real application support are merely tools for insiders to cash out.
The seven-year story of XRP reminds us:
Long-term holding does not equal wealth accumulation
Without adoption and utility, ROI is zero
Retail investors are easily sacrificed as "exit liquidity"
For investors, the only way out is:
DYOR (Do Your Own Research)
Choose projects carefully
Avoid wasting time and money on tokens harvested by insiders
Otherwise, what you invest is not an investment, but simply liquidity for others to realize their profits.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Phishing Risks in DeFi: What Investors Must Do to Protect Their Assets
- DeFi phishing attacks now account for 56.5% of breaches in 2025, surpassing technical exploits as the sector's top security threat. - 2025 phishing losses exceeded $410M, with AI-generated scams achieving 54% click-through rates and triggering market instability like the Venus Protocol $13.5M incident. - Investors must adopt institutional custody solutions, prioritize user education, and demand governance upgrades to combat phishing risks undermining DeFi's trustless model. - Cybercriminals increasingly

Is Bitcoin’s ETF-Driven Growth Sustainable Amid Shifting Institutional Demand?
- -2025 institutional crypto demand shows Bitcoin ETFs rebounding with $33.6B holdings, while Ethereum ETFs face volatile inflows/outflows. - -Bitcoin's zero-yield model contrasts with Ethereum's 6% staking returns under the CLARITY Act, driving dual-asset allocation strategies. - -Ethereum's deflationary tokenomics and regulatory clarity attract 59% of institutions planning >5% crypto allocations in 2025. - -Solana/XRP ETFs gain traction with $311M combined inflows, reflecting diversification into high-gr

MoonBull ($MOBU): The Whitelist-Driven Meme Coin 2.0 with 1000x Potential
- MoonBull ($MOBU) redefines meme coins with structured incentives, Ethereum-based scalability, and institutional-grade security, positioning as a 1000x opportunity in 2025. - Its tokenomics allocate 30% to liquidity pools, 20% for 66-80% APY staking rewards, and 2% auto-burn per transaction, creating a self-sustaining flywheel effect. - Leveraging Ethereum Layer 2 infrastructure (Arbitrum/Base), MoonBull achieves 10,000 TPS and 53% lower gas fees, enabling seamless DeFi integration and institutional credi

Ethereum's Institutional Adoption: A Strategic Asset in Web3 Expansion
- Ethereum's 4.5–5.2% staking yields and 2025 SEC reclassification as a utility token drove $9.4B ETF inflows and 29.6% supply staked by institutions. - 53.14% of $26.63B RWA tokenization market relies on Ethereum, with BlackRock and Goldman Sachs tokenizing $10.8B U.S. Treasuries and $8.32B gold. - DeFi TVL surged to $223B in 2025 via L2 scalability, enabling institutional yield generation through tokenized RWAs and programmable finance. - Regulatory clarity under GENIUS Act and Ethereum's deflationary su

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








