SBF's lawyer completed the closing argument and insisted on defending SBF not guilty.
SBF's attorney Mark S. Cohen completed his closing argument in court on Wednesday evening local time, requesting the court and jury to find that SBF acted in "good faith" throughout its operation of FTX and Alameda Research, and therefore cannot be found guilty of fraud. In his closing argument, the attorney stated that it was "real-world miscommunications," "mistakes," and "delays" that harmed other members of FTX and Bankman-Fried's crypto empire, not intentional fraud.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Mint Blockchain Integrates Chainlink CCIP to Power Cross-Chain Connectivity
Ethereum (ETH) Soars Above $2000; What’s Next?
Fartcoin Price Analysis: Profit-Taking Zones to Watch if Solana Price Crosses $200
38% Dogecoin Rebound, Cardano Tests AI Limits, But Unstaked’s AI Advantage Steals the Show
Dogecoin (DOGE) jumps 38%, and Cardano (ADA) launches an AI testnet, but Unstaked’s advanced AI agents go beyond marketing, offering real impact and value.Dogecoin (DOGE) Future: Aiming for $3.94 with MomentumCardano (ADA) Blockchain Tests AI ScalabilityUnstaked: AI That Goes Beyond MarketingFinal Take: Real AI Utility vs. Hype

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








