Former Cred executives sentenced to 88 months in prison
- Cred left billions in losses with cryptocurrency loans
- Former CEO and CFO convicted of fraud against 6.000 customers
- The COVID-19 crisis exposed serious flaws in Cred's model
Cred, a former San Francisco-based cryptocurrency lending platform, became the protagonist of one of the industry's costliest collapses after exposing risky and deceptive financial practices. Two of its top executives, co-founder and former CEO Daniel Schatt and former CFO Joseph Podulka, received combined sentences of 88 months in prison for defrauding thousands of customers.
Senior U.S. District Judge William Alsup, sentenced Schatt to 52 months in prison , while Podulka received 36 months. In addition, both will have to serve three years of supervised release and pay a fine of $25.000 each.
According to authorities, more than 6.000 customers suffered losses exceeding $140 million directly related to Cred's practices. However, based on current cryptocurrency valuations, the total losses resulting from the company's bankruptcy in November 2020 exceed $1 billion.
Cred's business model consisted of offering dollar loans secured by cryptocurrencies and promised returns on customer deposits. To achieve this, the company relied heavily on partnerships with foreign entities, whose risks were not disclosed to investors.
The crisis began in March 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic caused a sharp drop in the price of Bitcoin. This movement exposed serious flaws in Cred's hedging strategy, leaving the company without protection against further market fluctuations.
A few days after the crash, Cred was informed by one of its hedging partners that it needed to liquidate all positions immediately, further jeopardizing its financial stability. Meanwhile, a Chinese company on which Cred depended was unable to honor tens of millions of dollars in commitments.
Despite the critical situation, executives chose to conceal the problems and continued to assure customers that operations were "functioning normally." During a public hearing on March 18, 2020, Schatt reinforced this false narrative, even though he was aware of the precarious situation.
In May 2024, both defendants pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, ending years of legal disputes and marking yet another episode that highlights the risks associated with companies operating in the cryptocurrency-backed lending sector.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Behavioral Finance and the Reflection Effect: Navigating FBTC's Volatility with Psychological Insight
- Fidelity's FBTC ETP exemplifies how behavioral biases like the reflection effect distort risk preferences in crypto markets. - 2025 case studies show retail investors panic-selling during losses while institutions exploit mispricings, amplifying volatility. - Behavioral indicators (volume spikes, sentiment shifts) and disciplined strategies help investors navigate sentiment-fueled price extremes. - FBTC's volatility patterns reflect maturing digital assets, where psychological factors increasingly drive

Behavioral Finance and the Probability-Range Reflection Effect: Navigating Risk in BTBT's Strategic Shift
- Bit Digital's strategic shift from Bitcoin mining to Ethereum staking, alongside its WhiteFiber IPO, positions it as a key player in institutional Ethereum markets. - The probability-range reflection effect explains how investors overweight low-probability losses (e.g., ETH price drops) while underweighting high-probability gains (e.g., staking growth potential). - With 105,015 ETH staked (~$445M) and 3.1% annualized yields, BTBT's exposure to Ethereum volatility creates behavioral risks amid market corr

The Rise of Ethereum Treasuries: How Institutional Adoption is Reshaping Debt Markets
- Ethereum-backed instruments attract $2.44B in Q2 2025 as SEC reclassifies ETH as utility token, enabling institutional adoption. - Major firms like Goldman Sachs ($721.8M) and Jane Street ($190.4M) allocate capital to ETH ETFs, leveraging staking yields (3-14%) over traditional treasuries. - Tokenized RWAs ($5.3B in U.S. Treasuries) and liquid staking derivatives ($43.7B TVL) drive Ethereum's programmable infrastructure, outpacing Bitcoin's zero-yield model. - Regulatory clarity via CLARITY Act and SEC-a

Legal Regimes and Corporate Disclosure: Shaping the Future of Solana ETFs
- Solana ETF leverages Swiss civil law (FCL) framework to avoid U.S. regulatory turbulence, prioritizing legal certainty over granular disclosures. - CL investors demand exhaustive risk assessments, contrasting FCL investors' trust in institutional frameworks, shaping market responses to governance risks. - FASB's 2025 digital asset accounting rules boost institutional adoption, while SEC's cautious oversight balances transparency with investor protection. - ETF's indirect SOL exposure via derivatives rais

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








