Middle Eastern crude oil supply is gradually recovering, but why do oil prices remain high?
As Middle Eastern crude supply gradually recovers, Brent oil prices remain above $100 per barrel. Goldman Sachs believes that the improvement in supply has not yet eased the pressure brought by historically low global oil inventories and geopolitical risks. The market's concern over potential supply disruptions continues to support oil prices.
In its report published on October 8, Goldman Sachs noted that crude oil exports from the Persian Gulf (including undeclared exports) have reached or surpassed the average level expected for 2025, yet Brent prices are still in the triple digits. To explain this divergence, Goldman Sachs updated its Brent pricing model to incorporate global visible onshore inventories outside the OECD.
Data shows that global visible oil inventories have fallen to near historic lows since 2017, thus supporting the market’s need to replenish inventories. Meanwhile, the average risk premium in the Brent time spread in September, reflecting factors such as geopolitics, reached $22 per barrel, the second highest on record, only after April 2026.
Goldman Sachs believes that even if Middle Eastern oil supply continues to recover, as long as there are no clear diplomatic solutions to the geopolitical situation, concerns over supply disruptions may continue to support oil prices. In other words, current oil prices reflect not only actual supply and demand but also the market's pricing of future supply risks.
Global Inventory Tightening Continues to Support the Physical Market
Goldman Sachs divides Brent prices into two components: one is the price benchmark reflecting long-term production costs, where the fair value of 36-month forward Brent is currently about $76/barrel; the other is the spot-to-forward price premium—namely, the time spread—which is mainly affected by inventories, the cost of holding oil, and market risk sentiment.
Previously, Goldman Sachs mainly used OECD commercial inventories to explain changes in the time spread. But since 2026, the price difference between one-month and 36-month Brent futures contracts has risen about $30/barrel year-to-date, an increase of about 42%, while OECD commercial inventories have shown almost no change during the same period, indicating that this single indicator can no longer fully explain oil price trends.
For this reason, Goldman Sachs has incorporated global visible onshore inventories outside the OECD into its model. Their estimates show that for every 100 million barrel decrease in OECD commercial stock, Brent’s fair value rises by about $8 per barrel; for every 100 million barrel decrease in visible onshore inventories in other regions, fair value increases by slightly over $2 per barrel. If supply drops or demand rises by 1 million barrels per day for six months straight, Brent’s fair value would rise by roughly $6.5 per barrel.
OECD inventories have a greater impact on prices, both because of more complete historical records and because Brent and WTI benchmarks are more closely tied to OECD markets. This also means that even if Middle Eastern supply gradually recovers, as long as global inventories remain low, the physical market cannot quickly shift to oversupply, and oil prices will remain fundamentally supported.
High Risk Premium and Further Financial Demand Support Oil Prices
Besides inventories, market fears surrounding geopolitical conflicts and supply disruptions are also driving up oil prices.
Goldman Sachs defines the difference between the actual time spread and the model’s estimated fair value as the risk premium. Using the updated model, the average risk premium in September reached $22 per barrel, the second highest on record, second only to April 2026. If only OECD commercial inventories are considered, the figure would be $29 per barrel, indicating that incorporating inventories in other regions allows the model to more accurately reflect the tightness in the physical market.
Goldman Sachs points out that the risk premium reflects not only market concerns over supply disruptions but is also driven by financial investment demand. The implied volatility skew of Brent call options and geopolitical risk indices both reflect investors’ need to guard against sudden oil price surges.
Additionally, crude oil futures are becoming a tool for some investors to hedge risks in other assets. When supply shocks drive inflation expectations higher and simultaneously suppress bond and stock performance, asset management institutions may increase holdings of crude oil futures to hedge losses in their portfolios. This type of demand further supports oil prices, keeping them higher than what could be explained by fundamentals like inventories alone.
Goldman Sachs predicts that the risk premium will eventually return to its historical average, or close to zero. However, the team cautions that even if Middle Eastern supply gradually recovers, as long as there are no clear signs of diplomatic solutions to the geopolitical landscape, the risk premium may remain elevated for a longer period of time.
Therefore, restored supply does not mean oil price risks will subside simultaneously. Low global inventories, combined with persistent worries about supply disruptions, may limit the room for oil prices to fall and leave them at risk of further increases.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Delta Air Lines Lowers Profit Forecast as Fuel Cost Increase Outpaces Ticket Price Growth
Delta Air Lines lowers its annual profit forecast due to a $6 billion increase in fuel costs; sharply rising ticket prices test travelers’ willingness to pay. The company’s refinery business is expected to generate $700 million in profits to help offset the impact of fuel costs. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Reuters Chicago, October 9 – Delta Air Lines (DAL.N) lowered the midpoint of its annual profit forecast by nearly a quarter on Friday, as surging fuel costs offset the positive effects of strong travel demand and higher ticket prices. This downgrade highlights the increasingly severe challenges faced by U.S. airlines: if fuel prices remain high, will passengers be willing to accept further price hikes? Airlines have already increased ticket prices considerably this year, and analysts warn that further hikes could test travelers’ willingness to continue spending. The Atlanta-based airline expects its annual fuel spending to increase by about $6 billion compared to last year. Its third-quarter fuel expenses jumped 62% year-on-year to $4.1 billion, more than $500 million higher than July’s expectations. When asked about the reasons for the revised forecast, Delta CFO Erik Snell told reporters, “It’s entirely a fuel issue,” noting that crude oil and refined jet fuel prices have both increased since the summer. Delta now expects adjusted annual earnings per share of $5.10–$5.60, down from its July forecast of $6.50–$7.50. According to data from London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), the new median of $5.35 is below analysts’ average forecast of $5.46. The company expects an adjusted pre-tax profit of $4.5 billion in 2026. According to LSEG, third-quarter adjusted earnings per share were $1.72, slightly below the average analyst forecast of $1.76. Its adjusted operating margin dropped from 11.1% to 9.4%. Delta is the first major U.S. airline to report third-quarter earnings; its competitors United Airlines (UAL.O), American Airlines (AAL.O), and Southwest Airlines (LUV.N) will release their results later this month. Ticket Price Increases According to the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in the first eight months of 2026, U.S. airlines spent $42.9 billion on fuel for scheduled flights, nearly $13.2 billion more than in the previous year, despite a slight decrease in fuel consumption. Strong demand and limited seat growth have helped airlines pass higher fuel costs onto passengers. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index, over the five months ending in August, average U.S. airfares increased about 25% year-on-year. With fuel prices remaining high and industry capacity growth set to further accelerate in the fourth quarter, analysts are closely watching whether airlines including Delta can raise ticket prices further without suppressing travel demand. Deutsche Bank analysts expect the industry’s proportion of fuel costs recouped through revenue to decline in the fourth quarter, with full recovery not expected until early 2027. Delta says demand remains strong. Snell noted that with fourth-quarter bookings already near 60%, the company expects revenue to increase by around 20% year-on-year. According to LSEG, Delta forecasts fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $1.15–$1.65, with the median $1.40 roughly in line with analysts’ average expectation of $1.39. Refinery Advantage Delta holds an advantage over other major U.S. airlines: it owns a refinery near Philadelphia, which Snell expects will generate $700 million in profits this year. “We own a refinery, which gives us a hedge—part hedge—on fuel prices that no other airline has,” he said. Delta acquired the Monroe refinery in 2012, which processes crude oil into jet fuel and other products. While Delta must still pay market prices for fuel consumed by its airline operations, refinery profits remain within the company. When the price spread between crude oil and refined products widens, this helps offset fuel cost pressures for airlines sourcing externally. However, this protection depends on refinery margins; when margins fall, the refinery may also incur losses. Nevertheless, the refinery can only partially ease the impact of rising fuel prices. Even with an expected refinery benefit of 40 cents per gallon, Delta forecasts its fuel cost to rise from $3.61 per gallon in the third quarter to $4.25 per gallon in the fourth quarter. Snell said fuel costs are expected to remain high for some time. “Ultimately, fuel prices will come down. As to when, we’re not sure,” he said. (For the convenience of non-native English speakers, Reuters offers automated translations of its reports into several other languages. Due to possible errors or lack of context in automated translations, Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translation texts and provides them only for reader convenience. Reuters assumes no responsibility for any damages or losses from use of automated translation featur
SUI Price Pullback Sparks Debate: Correction or Next Buying Opportunity?
"SaaS Apocalypse" Debunked? Autodesk (ADSK.US) and Intuit (INTU.US) Lead Growth Against the Trend as Wall Street Reprices the "AI Eating Software" Narrative
This week, Autodesk and Intuit are expected to record their strongest weekly gains in months, defying pressure on the overall technology sector. This strong performance signals a renewed optimism in the market regarding the growth prospects of the SaaS (Software as a Service) industry.
Starlink Targets the US Mobile Communication Market, SpaceX (SPCX.US) Opens New Growth Opportunities: Wall Street Focuses on the Reshaping of the Telecom Industry Landscape
Combining the existing satellite capacity, SpaceX is supplementing its capabilities to upgrade from “occasional emergency connectivity” to “daily mobile service.” The satellite network provides wide-area coverage and fills ground blind spots, while low-frequency terrestrial networks improve connectivity inside buildings and in environments with complex obstructions. The two form a complement to each other.
