Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Bitcoin Blunder: Somebody Just Lost $170,000 In BTC Transaction Fee

Bitcoin Blunder: Somebody Just Lost $170,000 In BTC Transaction Fee

CryptopotatoCryptopotato2024/01/17 00:22
By:Andrew ThrouvalasMore posts by this author

A Bitcoin user tried to consolidate his UTXOs, but made a very costly mistake.

A lucky Bitcoin miner just enjoyed another splash of profits thanks to an abnormally high fee paid by one of the network’s users.

Blockchain data shows that an unknown user paid 4 BTC ($172,000) in a transaction fee on Tuesday, dwarfing the amount actually needed to process the transfer.

A Costly Blockchain Mistake

According to mempool.space , the transaction itself only sent 2.9 BTC to the intended recipient, meaning the attached fee was over 133% the size of the transaction itself.

By the site’s metrics, the transaction was overpaid by a factor of 29,992x. Specifically, the user paid 1,800,890 satoshis per vByte (sat/vB) – a metric for calculating demand for Bitcoin block space at a given time. For that block, the standard transaction only paid roughly 60 sat/vB.

“When you’re consolidating UTXOs make sure to actually consolidate them instead of turning one into a fee,” said Tomer Strolight, editor-in-chief for Swan Bitcoin, regarding the transaction in a post to X.

UTXO stands for Unspent Transaction Output, meaning an individual BTC transfer sitting separately within a user’s Bitcoin wallet. These transfers can be thought of as chunks of bitcoin that the user controls: some chunks are larger than others (comprising more BTC) and all of the chunks put together make up the user’s wallet balance.

Generally speaking, its best to avoid dividing one’s BTC into several small UTXOs – especially for economic reasons. When sending large amounts of BTC later, the user must pay a fee on every single UTXO that moves, meaning the more there are, the more expensive the transaction will be.

On-chain data suggests that the high-paying user was attempting to consolidate his UTXOs to avoid this problem – a technique for merging several smaller outputs into a larger one. Days earlier, the same user had received two Bitcoin transactions worth 2.9 BTC and 4.03 BTC each – the same values as his Tuesday transfer and fee respectively.

Will The User Get His Bitcoin Back?

Though Bitcoin transactions and fees are technically irreversible, overpaid transfers have often been paid back by the miners who receive them.

For example, in September, Bitcoin mining pool F2Pool returned funds to Paxos after the latter accidentally paid $500,000 for a Bitcoin transaction.

Months later, mining pool giant Antpool reimbursed an anonymous user’s record-shattering $3.1 million fee to miners.

You Might Also Like:

  • Bitcoiner Overpays $3.1 Million In Largest Ever Transaction Fee
  • Bitcoin Dumps To $42,000 Triggering $338 Million In Liquidations
  • Bitcoin Tops $41K Leaving Close to $150M in Short Positions Liquidated
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

A decade-long tug-of-war ends: "Crypto Market Structure Bill" sprints to the Senate

At the Blockchain Association Policy Summit, U.S. Senators Gillibrand and Lummis stated that the "Crypto Market Structure Bill" is expected to have its draft released by the end of this week, with revisions and hearings scheduled for next week. The bill aims to establish clear boundaries for digital assets by adopting a classification-based regulatory framework, clearly distinguishing between digital commodities and digital securities, and providing a pathway for exemptions for mature blockchains to ensure that regulation does not stifle technological progress. The bill also requires digital commodity trading platforms to register with the CFTC and establishes a joint advisory committee to prevent regulatory gaps or overlapping oversight. Summary generated by Mars AI. The accuracy and completeness of this summary, generated by the Mars AI model, is still being iteratively updated.

MarsBit2025/12/12 11:17
A decade-long tug-of-war ends: "Crypto Market Structure Bill" sprints to the Senate

Gold surpasses the $4,310 mark—Is the "bull frenzy" returning?

Boosted by expectations of further easing from the Federal Reserve, gold has risen for four consecutive days. Technical indicators show strong bullish signals, but there remains one more hurdle before reaching a new all-time high.

Jin102025/12/12 11:11
Gold surpasses the $4,310 mark—Is the "bull frenzy" returning?

Trend Research: Why Are We Still Bullish on ETH?

Against the backdrop of relatively accommodative expectations in both China and the US, which suppress asset downside volatility, and with extreme fear and capital sentiment not yet fully recovered, ETH remains in a favorable "buy zone."

深潮2025/12/12 10:15
Trend Research: Why Are We Still Bullish on ETH?
© 2025 Bitget