Brale unveils tokenization API to scale custom tokens across 30 blockchains
Building a stablecoin used to mean picking a blockchain, building the plumbing, and then doing the whole thing over again when someone asked you to support a second chain. Brale thinks that’s the wrong model, and it’s built a protocol to prove it.
The U.S.-regulated stablecoin infrastructure company has unveiled a Tokenization API designed to let enterprises issue and manage custom tokens, including fiat-backed stablecoins, across nearly 30 blockchain networks through a single integration. Instead of treating each chain as a separate project, the API bundles custody management, minting and burning mechanics, transfers, and multi-chain transaction execution into one interface.
What Brale is actually building
Issuers retain control over reserves, compliance, and the economics of the token itself. Brale positions itself as infrastructure, not a co-issuer, which matters enormously in a regulatory environment where accountability questions around stablecoin reserves are becoming central to legislation in Washington.
As of a July 2026 blog post, Brale says it supports over 100 live programs and processes billions in annual volume. The company holds money transmitter licenses across 45 U.S. jurisdictions and has achieved SOC 2 Type II certification.
Recent chain expansions include support for the XRP Ledger, added in October 2025, and Algorand, which came online in January 2026.
The Visa connection and what it signals
Brale is currently running a proof-of-concept with Visa for private stablecoin settlement on the Canton Network, with that initiative described as ongoing as of June 2026.
Brale also works with Modern Treasury, a payments operations platform used widely in fintech, to enable stablecoin payouts. BitGo rounds out the named partner list, pointing to the custody layer of the infrastructure.
Why the scalability problem is harder than it looks
Brale’s approach is to abstract multi-chain complexity behind a single API layer. The stablecoin infrastructure market has been heating up steadily, with the GENIUS Act and related U.S. stablecoin legislation moving through Congress in 2025 and 2026 creating both urgency and opportunity for platforms that can offer compliant, regulated issuance infrastructure.
Getting licensed across 45 U.S. jurisdictions isn’t something a competitor can replicate quickly. The 0-basis-point on/off-ramp offering removes the friction cost at the entry and exit points of a stablecoin program, a meaningful incentive for issuers comparing total cost of ownership across platforms, particularly for high-volume programs where small per-transaction costs compound significantly.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Key Developments in Anthropic IPO: Plans to Allow Existing Shareholders to "Cash Out," Potential Lockup Extension, Expected Listing as Early as Late September
According to reports, Anthropic is considering allowing existing shareholders to sell a portion of their shares in the IPO while also exploring a lock-up period longer than 180 days. This aims to meet some liquidity needs of early investors and employees, while controlling the supply and price volatility of shares after the listing. The company plans to publicly disclose its prospectus after the US Labor Day on September 7, and hold an Investor Day in mid-September. Prediction markets indicate that the probability of the company completing its IPO before October has risen to 86%.
"New Federal Reserve News Agency": Bessent's frequent interventions test the boundaries of Federal Reserve independence
According to The Wall Street Journal reporter Nick Timiraos, U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen is gradually intervening in the Federal Reserve’s traditional policy domain by expanding long-term Treasury buybacks and suppressing yields, sparking concerns about central bank independence. The timing of these moves is abrupt and has been criticized as "price management," adding pressure to the existing interest rate disagreements within the Federal Reserve. This approach also undermines Fed Chair Powell’s policy framework, which relies on obtaining real signals from market prices.
Polygon loses 12% amid intense selling pressure: Can POL redeem itself?

Goldman Sachs’ non-AI S&P 500 index outperforms regular index since June
