In its initial DSA sanction, the EU imposes a €120M fine on X for a ‘misleading’ blue check verification process
European Commission Issues First DSA Fine to X
The European Commission has handed down its inaugural penalty under the Digital Services Act (DSA), targeting X, the social media platform previously known as Twitter and now owned by Elon Musk.
The Commission’s main concern centers on X’s policy of allowing users to purchase a “blue checkmark”—a symbol that once signified verified identity on the platform. Previously, this badge was reserved for individuals whose identities had been confirmed by the company.
Describing the blue checkmark system as misleading, the EU’s executive body announced a €120 million (approximately $140 million) fine against X, citing violations of the DSA’s transparency requirements.
Additional infractions highlighted by the Commission include insufficient openness regarding X’s advertising database and the company’s failure to grant researchers access to public data.
Changes to Verification and Transparency
Before Musk’s acquisition, Twitter awarded blue checkmarks to journalists, public officials, celebrities, and other notable figures after verifying their identities. In 2023, this policy was scrapped. Now, the blue check simply indicates that a user subscribes to X Premium and meets basic criteria, such as having a profile photo, a display name, and a linked phone number—without any substantial identity verification.
The Commission stated, “X’s approach to ‘verified accounts’ misleads users, breaching the DSA’s prohibition on deceptive design. Anyone can now pay for the ‘verified’ status, making it challenging for users to determine the authenticity of accounts and the content they see.”
This practice, according to the Commission, increases the risk of scams, impersonation, and manipulation on the platform.
Advertising Repository and Data Access Concerns
The regulator also criticized X’s advertising repository for failing to meet DSA standards for transparency and accessibility. The Commission noted that X imposes unnecessary delays on access requests and omits crucial information, such as ad content, topics, and the identities of advertisers.
“These shortcomings prevent researchers and the public from independently assessing potential risks associated with online advertising,” the Commission remarked.
Another significant issue is X’s restriction of researcher access to public data. The DSA requires platforms to enable independent research into systemic risks, but the Commission’s investigation found that X does not adequately facilitate this.
“X’s procedures for granting researchers access to public data create needless obstacles, effectively hindering research into systemic risks within the EU,” the Commission added.
Background and Next Steps
This enforcement action follows a two-year investigation by the Commission into suspected violations related to risk management, content moderation, manipulative design, advertising transparency, and researcher data access.
Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s executive vice-president for Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy, commented, “There is no place in the EU for deceiving users with blue checkmarks, hiding advertising information, or blocking researchers.”
X has been given 60 days to present a plan for addressing the issues related to blue checkmarks, and 90 days to submit a strategy for improving transparency and accessibility regarding advertisements and public data.
Violations of the DSA can result in severe penalties, including fines of up to 6% of a company’s global annual revenue.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Federal Reserve's Change in Policy and Its Impact on Cryptocurrency Markets
- Fed's 2025 policy tightening and regulatory shifts reshaped crypto markets, triggering capital reallocation and volatility amid $340B balance sheet contraction. - Bitcoin ETFs lost $3.79B in November 2025 as investors shifted to stablecoins and altcoins, driven by inflation hedging and regulatory clarity under the GENIUS Act. - Crypto-ETF performance diverged sharply, with Solana/XRP funds attracting $421M/$410M inflows while Bitcoin ETFs faced stagnation despite $22.32B net creations. - Policy uncertain

Solana's Latest Price Drop: Analyzing Systemic Vulnerabilities in Advanced Blockchain Platforms
- Solana's 2025 price drop and declining user activity, despite strong on-chain metrics, highlight systemic risks in high-performance blockchains. - Network Value to Transaction (NVT) ratio spikes and macroeconomic headwinds exposed vulnerabilities in consensus mechanisms and validator centralization. - Security breaches, regulatory uncertainties, and cross-chain bridge risks amplified downward pressure, contrasting with whale accumulation and real-world asset adoption growth. - Case studies of Avalanche a

SOL Price Forecast for 2025: Can the Altcoin Surge Last?
- Solana (SOL) gains traction in 2025 through institutional partnerships and ETFs, boosting blockchain adoption. - Despite $101.7M ETF inflows, SOL prices fell 30% by December, highlighting macroeconomic pressures over institutional demand. - Proposed inflation reduction (SIMD-0411) and short-term rallies signal resilience, but Bitcoin/Ethereum dominance complicates altcoin sustainability. - Analysts project $400–$500 SOL by year-end, contingent on resolving rate volatility and global economic uncertaintie

The BTC Collapse: Examining the Triggers and Consequences for 2026
- Bitcoin's 2026 collapse risk stems from leverage, quantum threats, and macroeconomic fragility, mirroring 2008/1929 crises. - Leverage-driven liquidation loops and corporate Bitcoin holdings create self-fulfilling price cascades across crypto and traditional markets. - Quantum computing could break Bitcoin's cryptography, while regulatory uncertainty amplifies systemic risks in its financialized ecosystem. - Historical parallels highlight recurring patterns of speculative excess and leverage, urging robu
